Assured Guaranty vs Golub Capital BDC
Assured Guaranty Ltd. and Golub Capital BDC Inc. are compared on business models, financial performance, and market context, with neutral analysis designed to illuminate differences. The content stays accessible and objective, avoiding recommendations or advice. Educational content, not financial advice.
Assured Guaranty Ltd. and Golub Capital BDC Inc. are compared on business models, financial performance, and market context, with neutral analysis designed to illuminate differences. The content stays...
Which Baskets Do They Appear In?
No baskets available in this category
Which Baskets Do They Appear In?
No baskets available in this category
Investment Analysis
Pros
- Recent quarters have seen revenue and earnings per share consistently beat analyst expectations, reflecting operational strength and disciplined underwriting.
- The insurance segment has achieved record new business production, driven by demand for financial guaranty and municipal bond insurance.
- Investor confidence appears resilient, with the stock reacting positively to earnings beats despite broader market volatility.
Considerations
- Net income has declined year-over-year, partly due to less favourable loss development in key US residential mortgage-backed securities transactions.
- Adjusted operating income in the insurance segment decreased compared to the prior year, suggesting potential variability in earnings quality.
- Exposure to structured finance and municipal markets may lead to earnings volatility during periods of credit stress or fiscal tightening.
Pros
- Current return on equity has risen sharply relative to the past year and now exceeds the ten-year average, indicating improved profitability.
- The portfolio is concentrated in senior secured, floating-rate loans to middle-market companies, offering granular diversification and resilient income streams.
- Management’s long-term track record in middle-market lending and low historical credit losses may support stable performance across cycles.
Considerations
- The business model relies heavily on the health of US middle-market borrowers, which could be vulnerable in an economic downturn.
- Being externally managed may introduce potential conflicts of interest and limit direct shareholder influence over operational decisions.
- Investments are primarily in below-investment-grade securities, increasing credit risk and potential for capital impairment during stress.
Why invest with Nemo?
Zero Commission
Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.
Trusted & Regulated
Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.
6% Interest on Cash
Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.
Discover More Comparisons
Assured Guaranty vs Texas Capital
Assured Guaranty vs Texas Capital
Assured Guaranty vs TFS Financial
Assured Guaranty vs TFS Financial
ServisFirst Bancshares vs Golub Capital BDC
ServisFirst Bancshares vs Golub Capital BDC