• 5 min read
• Published on 17 August 2025
Hey! We are Nemo.
Nemo, short for Never Miss Out, is a mobile investment platform that delivers curated, data-driven investment ideas to your fingertips. It offers commission-free trading across stocks, ETFs, crypto, and CFDs, along with AI-powered tools, real-time market alerts, and themed stock collections called Nemes.
Download the App
Scan the QR code to download the Nemo app and start investing on Nemo today
published-on
Read article
published-on
Read article
published-on
Read article
published-on
Read article
published-on
Read article
View the full Basket:American Chipmakers: A Tariff-Driven Shift
Let’s be honest, when a politician starts throwing around figures like a 300% tariff, the first instinct is to roll one’s eyes. It all sounds like a bit of pantomime, designed to grab headlines rather than reshape global economics. But every now and then, the bluster solidifies into something real, something that could fundamentally alter the landscape for investors. To me, Donald Trump’s latest threat against foreign-made semiconductors feels like one of those moments. It’s a policy so audacious, so disruptive, that we simply cannot afford to ignore it.
View the full Basket:American Chipmakers: A Tariff-Driven Shift
Forget the complex geopolitical arguments for a moment and just consider the raw numbers. Imagine you’re a tech company buying a crucial chip for £10. Suddenly, the government slaps a £30 tariff on it. Your cost is now £40. It’s not a subtle nudge, it’s a sledgehammer to the supply chain. For decades, the entire tech industry has been built on a model of global efficiency, chasing the cheapest and best manufacturing, which usually led them to Asia. A 300% tariff doesn’t just challenge that model, it blows it to smithereens.
This isn't about finding a slightly cheaper alternative. It’s about survival. Companies would be forced, kicking and screaming, to find domestic suppliers. The globalised, hyper-efficient system we’ve all grown accustomed to could be thrown into reverse almost overnight. The question for us, as investors, is who stands to benefit from such organised chaos?
View the full Basket:American Chipmakers: A Tariff-Driven Shift
In this potential new world, a few American names immediately come to mind. Take Intel, for instance. The company has felt a bit like a lumbering giant lately, watching nimbler rivals in Taiwan run circles around it. But its one great advantage has always been its significant manufacturing footprint in the United States. If foreign chips become prohibitively expensive, Intel’s factories in Arizona and Oregon could suddenly look less like legacy assets and more like the most valuable real estate in Silicon Valley.
Then you have a company like NVIDIA. While it designs its world-beating AI chips in California, it relies heavily on overseas manufacturing. A tariff of this magnitude would undoubtedly cause a colossal headache, but it would also accelerate a shift to domestic production that is already underway. NVIDIA is too critical to the future of technology to be left stranded. The same logic applies to Broadcom, whose diverse portfolio and established American relationships could position it to pick up significant business as others scramble to realign. This whole complex interplay of policy and production is what makes the American Chipmakers: A Tariff-Driven Shift theme so compelling, if a little nerve-wracking.
View the full Basket:American Chipmakers: A Tariff-Driven Shift
Of course, this is far from a done deal. Political threats are often just that, threats. The market loathes uncertainty, and this situation is dripping with it. Furthermore, you can’t just build a multi-billion dollar semiconductor foundry in a weekend. Rerouting the world’s most complex supply chain is the work of years, not months. Any investment in this theme requires a healthy dose of patience and a stomach for volatility. The chip industry is notoriously cyclical even in the best of times.
However, the underlying trend seems clear to me. The pandemic exposed the fragility of relying on a handful of foreign factories for the world’s most important components. The strategic push for technological sovereignty is real, with or without these specific tariffs. This policy threat is merely an accelerant on a fire that was already burning. It has forced a conversation that was long overdue, and for the companies positioned on the right side of it, the potential rewards could be transformative.
View the full Basket:American Chipmakers: A Tariff-Driven Shift
View the full Basket:American Chipmakers: A Tariff-Driven Shift
View the full Basket:American Chipmakers: A Tariff-Driven Shift
View the full Basket:American Chipmakers: A Tariff-Driven Shift
View the full Basket:American Chipmakers: A Tariff-Driven Shift
View the full Basket:American Chipmakers: A Tariff-Driven Shift
This article is marketing material and should not be construed as investment advice. No information set out in this article be considered, as advice, recommendation, offer, or a solicitation, to buy or sell any financial product, nor is it financial, investment, or trading advice. Any references to specific financial product or investment strategy are for illustrative / educational purposes only and subject to change without notice. It is the investor’s responsibility to evaluate any prospective investment, assess their own financial situation, and seek independent professional advice. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Please refer to our Risk Disclosure.
published-on
Read article
published-on
Read article
published-on
Read article
published-on
Read article
published-on
Read article