• 11 min read
• Published on 21 July 2026
Hey! We are Nemo.
Nemo, short for Never Miss Out, is a mobile investment platform that delivers curated, data-driven investment ideas to your fingertips. It offers commission-free trading across stocks, ETFs, crypto, and CFDs, along with AI-powered tools, real-time market alerts, and themed stock collections called Nemes.
Download the App
Scan the QR code to download the Nemo app and start investing on Nemo today
Published on 12 September 2026
Read article
Published on 12 September 2026
Read article
Published on 12 September 2026
Read article
Published on 11 September 2026
Read article
Published on 11 September 2026
Read article
The Engine Cut. The SpaceX Starship Flight 13 abort just pushed back the clock. A sudden automated scrub delays crucial Starlink expansion milestones, making the heavily anticipated SpaceX IPO 2026 timeline look a bit shaky. Execution is everything. Period.
The Pivot Upward. Smart money is looking past the launchpad. The recently reported SpaceX Pentagon AI deal could completely rewrite the financial narrative, pivoting the firm from a pure rocket builder to a massive defence infrastructure player. It's a fundamental shift in revenue potential.
The Proxy Play. Since retail traders can't buy private shares directly, the hunt for space stocks to buy is intensifying. Public alternatives like Destiny Tech100 DXYZ, Rocket Lab RKLB, and AST SpaceMobile ASTS offer a side door into this sector. By using a regulated broker offering commission-free trading, you can explore these themes with small amounts and fractional shares.
The Premium Trap. Expectation doesn't equal execution. Buying into closed-end space funds often means paying a massive premium that might collapse if future test flights fail. This is a highly volatile sector where you could lose money, so leaning on AI-driven research and real-time insights is essential to spot the risks early.
Space is fundamentally unforgiving. To me, the most revealing moment of the summer did not involve a fiery explosion or a triumphant splashdown. It involved absolute silence. On 16 July, Starship Flight 13 was scrubbed in the final seconds before ignition. The vehicle stood there on the pad, fully fuelled and going nowhere.
This was not a human decision made by a nervous engineer in a control room. The onboard flight systems detected an out of limits condition and automatically terminated the sequence before a single engine could fire. That is exactly what the software is designed to do. I find it fascinating that the biggest bottleneck to the commercialisation of the cosmos is often a single line of automated code.
In the grand scheme of SpaceX and its ambitious test programme, a scrub is hardly an isolated incident. Previous Starship flights have faced endless range delays and technical holds. The company confirmed it was reviewing the telemetry, though they kept the precise trigger for the abort firmly under wraps.
What makes this particular delay matter to investors is the timing. Flight 13 was supposed to advance technologies that are absolutely central to deploying the next generation of Starlink satellites at scale. A delay here is not just a passing headline about a rocket. It compresses the schedule for downstream commercial milestones, and that is where the financial reality begins to bite.
Let us talk about the money. Starlink is the golden goose for SpaceX. It is the revenue engine that keeps the lights on while the engineers try to conquer Mars. Every time a Starship test flight gets pushed back, the cadence at which SpaceX can deploy its heavier, more capable Starlink satellites slips further into the future.
For those of you eagerly watching the rumour mill for a 2026 SpaceX public listing, this abort introduces a credibility question that seasoned private market investors know intimately. We all operate under the assumption that SpaceX is grooming itself for a high profile market debut within the next eighteen months. It could be a traditional initial public offering, or it might be a direct listing, or they could even spin off Starlink entirely.
The problem with relying on that narrative is that repeated test setbacks historically weigh heavy on private round valuations. More visibly, they crush the premiums attached to the closed end funds that retail investors use to get a piece of the action.
If you want a barometer for this sentiment, look at Destiny Tech100. This fund trades under the ticker DXYZ and holds direct stakes in late stage private technology companies. SpaceX is the crown jewel of their portfolio. When SpaceX hits a milestone, the fund's premium to its net asset value swells to frankly absurd levels. When a launch slips, that premium tends to compress sharply. The optimism that inflates DXYZ is heavily dependent on the perceived progress of the launch cadence. I always remind people that buying into a massive premium is a brilliant way to lose money if the underlying narrative suddenly stalls.
If the launch delays were the whole story, I would probably be quite bearish right now. But on 17 July, the Wall Street Journal reported something that fundamentally shifts the investment thesis. SpaceX is reportedly in active discussions to supply the United States Department of Defence with artificial intelligence computing capacity in space.
This is where the story gets properly interesting. You only have to observe how the AI Space Race (SpaceX-xAI) Creates New Investment Wave to realise that propulsion is only half the battle. If this deal goes through, SpaceX will position itself alongside tech giants like Microsoft, Amazon, and Google in the profoundly lucrative market for military cloud infrastructure.
Those terrestrial tech companies have secured massive contracts with the Pentagon over the last few years. The scale of the defence infrastructure market is staggering. By bringing its Starshield satellite network and orbital computing capabilities into this arena, SpaceX is attempting a genuine diversification of its revenue base.
A business that generates recurring revenue from government computing contracts is a drastically different beast from one relying entirely on launch frequency.
For investors trying to figure out which space stocks might survive the decade, this potential contract is a massive counterweight to the Starship delays. If SpaceX can become a floating data centre for the military, it could put a solid floor under their private valuations. It would reduce their reliance on consumer broadband subscriptions and smooth out the financial turbulence caused by stubborn rocket engines.
Here is the frustrating reality for the average retail investor. SpaceX remains a strictly private company. You cannot simply log into your brokerage account and buy a slice of Elon Musk's Martian dream. That is a structural fact of the market, and no trading platform can offer you direct shares.
What you can do, however, is look at the publicly traded companies that offer meaningful exposure to the exact same orbital trends. They are imperfect proxies, but they are the only sensible way onto the playing field.
Destiny Tech100, which I mentioned earlier, is the most direct route. Because DXYZ is listed on the New York Stock Exchange, anybody can buy it. The catch is that you are paying for expectation. The fund has historically traded at a massive premium to the actual value of its underlying assets. If the initial public offering sentiment fades, or if Starship continues to abort on the pad, that premium could vanish overnight. It is a legitimate vehicle, but you have to understand that you are buying hype as much as you are buying equity.
Then we have Rocket Lab. To me, Rocket Lab is the pragmatic alternative. They trade under the ticker RKLB. Unlike the funds that just hold private shares, Rocket Lab is an end to end space company that actually builds and launches things. They have carved out a very reliable niche in the small payload market with their Electron rocket.
Rocket Lab is a direct beneficiary of a busier commercial space sector. Starlink expansion, combined with growing demand from commercial and government satellite operators, creates a massive opportunity for anyone who can reliably reach orbit. Rocket Lab is also developing a medium lift vehicle called Neutron. This rocket is specifically designed for the missions that Starship is simply too massive to serve cost effectively. A rising tide lifts all boats, and a more active orbital economy could benefit Rocket Lab regardless of what happens on the SpaceX launch pad.
Finally, there is AST SpaceMobile, trading as ASTS. This company is building a cellular network in space. Their satellites are designed to connect directly with standard mobile phones without requiring the user to buy a specialist dish.
This puts ASTS in a very interesting relationship with Starlink. They are chasing the same macro trend of universal connectivity, but they are approaching it from different angles. Starlink wants to sell dedicated hardware to homes and businesses. AST SpaceMobile wants to partner with existing mobile network operators to patch the black spots in terrestrial coverage. They are not entirely competing for the same customers today, though they are both heavily reliant on regulatory approvals and successful launches.
In 2021, the entire space sector was a speculative playground. Today, it is rapidly becoming structural infrastructure. The companies that figure out how to generate cash flow in orbit are the ones that might actually reward patient capital.
It would be thoroughly irresponsible of me to discuss the commercialisation of space without pointing out just how brittle this sector really is. Investing in space stocks is not a passive exercise, and it is certainly not for the faint of heart. The risks are incredibly specific and entirely unforgiving.
You must understand that all investments carry risk, and you may lose money. This sector is unusually sensitive to test outcomes. A single catastrophic failure on a launch pad can wipe out months of equity gains for publicly traded space companies.
If Starship experiences further test failures, the commercial launch cadence for the next generation of Starlink will slip again. That would severely weaken the central narrative surrounding the company's growth, which could push any potential public listing further into the late 2020s.
Then there is the regulatory scrutiny. That reported Pentagon computing contract might sound wonderful on paper, but defence procurement is a notoriously slow and legally fraught process. Contracts of that scale are almost always subjected to intense scrutiny and legal challenges from competing bidders. A delayed contract is often as financially painful as a lost one.
We also have to talk about the competition. The legacy players are ossified, but they are finally waking up. Blue Origin is pushing forward with its New Glenn rocket, targeting the exact same commercial contracts that SpaceX relies upon. United Launch Alliance, which is backed by Boeing and Lockheed Martin, remains a massive force in government launch services. These competitors are not simply going to stand still while SpaceX works through the teething problems of its Starship development cycle.
If you are going to put your capital to work in this theme, you need to monitor these risk factors constantly. A narrative can turn on a dime when a telemetry reading forces an automated abort. The orbital economy is moving from science fiction into commercial reality, but the physics of getting there will remain brutally difficult for the foreseeable future.
View the full Basket:AI Space Race (SpaceX-xAI) Creates New Investment Wave
View the full Basket:AI Space Race (SpaceX-xAI) Creates New Investment Wave
This article is marketing material and should not be construed as investment advice. No information set out in this article be considered, as advice, recommendation, offer, or a solicitation, to buy or sell any financial product, nor is it financial, investment, or trading advice. Any references to specific financial product or investment strategy are for illustrative / educational purposes only and subject to change without notice. It is the investor’s responsibility to evaluate any prospective investment, assess their own financial situation, and seek independent professional advice. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Please refer to our Risk Disclosure.
Published on 12 September 2026
Read article
Published on 12 September 2026
Read article
Published on 12 September 2026
Read article
Published on 11 September 2026
Read article
Published on 11 September 2026
Read article