

QCR Holdings vs ProAssurance
This page compares QCR Holdings and ProAssurance, examining business models, financial performance, and market context to explain how the two groups operate within their sectors. It offers neutral, factual descriptions of strategies, revenue drivers, risk factors, and competitive environments. Educational content, not financial advice.
This page compares QCR Holdings and ProAssurance, examining business models, financial performance, and market context to explain how the two groups operate within their sectors. It offers neutral, fa...
Which Baskets Do They Appear In?
No baskets available in this category
Which Baskets Do They Appear In?
No baskets available in this category
Investment Analysis

QCR Holdings
QCRH
Pros
- QCR Holdings operates a diversified business model combining commercial banking and wealth management services, reducing reliance on any single revenue stream.
- The company has a strong regional presence with multiple community banks, which supports loyal customer bases and local market knowledge.
- Recent share price stability and modest growth indicate solid investor confidence and operational resilience in a competitive banking sector.
Considerations
- QCR Holdings faces competition from larger national banks with significantly higher market capitalisations, potentially limiting scale economies.
- The companyβs growth prospects may be constrained by its regional focus, limiting expansion opportunities compared to more diversified peers.
- Interest rate fluctuations and economic cycles could impact net interest margins and loan demand, given its concentrated banking operations.

ProAssurance
PRA
Pros
- ProAssurance specializes in niche insurance markets such as medical professional liability, which provides a defensible competitive position.
- The firm reported revenue above $1.1 billion with positive net income and demonstrates a solid return on equity indicating operational efficiency.
- Its planned merger with The Doctors Company, subject to regulatory approval, offers potential synergies and market share expansion.
Considerations
- ProAssuranceβs current combined ratio above 112% indicates underwriting losses, reflecting challenges in profitability amidst pricing pressures.
- The stockβs valuation includes some uncertainty, and recent earnings have missed estimates, highlighting execution risks in a competitive insurance market.
- The companyβs exposure to specialty insurance and workersβ compensation sectors may make it vulnerable to regulatory changes and claims volatility.
Why invest with Nemo?
Zero Commission
Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.
Trusted & Regulated
Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.
6% Interest on Cash
Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.
Discover More Comparisons


QCR Holdings vs Oaktree Specialty Lending
QCR Holdings vs Oaktree Specialty Lending


QCR Holdings vs Root
QCR Holdings vs Root


QCR Holdings vs Prospect Capital
QCR Holdings vs Prospect Capital