

Patria vs Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund
Patria (Patria Investments Ltd) and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund (Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc) are compared here. This page examines their business models, financial performance, and market context in a clear, neutral way. Educational content, not financial advice.
Patria (Patria Investments Ltd) and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund (Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc) are compared here. This page examines their business models, financial performance, and...
Investment Analysis

Patria
PAX
Pros
- Patria Investments Ltd specializes in private equity and venture capital with a diverse sector focus including agribusiness, energy, healthcare, and technology.
- The company shows a solid net profit margin of over 21% and a gross margin near 63%, indicating strong profitability and operational efficiency.
- It offers an attractive dividend yield of about 5.8%, appealing for income-focused investors seeking diversification in private markets.
Considerations
- Patria’s investment portfolio and revenue are heavily concentrated in Latin America, which exposes it to regional economic and political risks.
- The firm has a moderately leveraged balance sheet with a debt/equity ratio around 27%, which might constrain financial flexibility in volatile markets.
- Its market capitalization is relatively small at around $2.3–2.4 billion, limiting scale advantages relative to larger global asset managers.
Pros
- Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund invests broadly across U.S. infrastructure equities, including utilities, energy, and transport sectors, providing sector diversification.
- The fund manages a substantial portfolio worth over $3.3 billion with diversified holdings spanning multiple market capitalizations.
- It uses fundamental analysis and benchmarks against established infrastructure indices, aiming to deliver value by actively managing a focused sector portfolio.
Considerations
- With a high expense ratio near 3.86%, the fund’s costs may erode net returns compared to passive alternatives or lower-cost funds.
- The fund's closed-end structure can lead to valuation discounts versus net asset value, potentially impacting liquidity and pricing for investors.
- Exposure to U.S.-centric infrastructure equities may subject the fund to domestic economic and regulatory environment risks, including interest rate sensitivity.
Which Baskets Do They Appear In?
No baskets available in this category
Which Baskets Do They Appear In?
No baskets available in this category
Buy PAX or UTF in Nemo
Zero Commission
Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.
Trusted & Regulated
Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.
6% Interest on Cash
Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.
Discover More Comparisons


Patria vs Sixth Street Specialty Lending
Patria vs Sixth Street Specialty Lending


Patria vs GCM Grosvenor
Patria vs GCM Grosvenor


Patria vs Customers Bancorp
Patria Investments Ltd vs Customers Bancorp Inc