Jackson Financial vs PJT Partners
Jackson Financial vs PJT Partners: this page compares their business models, financial performance, and market context in a neutral, accessible way. It outlines how each company operates, what shapes their results, and the environment in which they compete. Educational content, not financial advice.
Jackson Financial vs PJT Partners: this page compares their business models, financial performance, and market context in a neutral, accessible way. It outlines how each company operates, what shapes ...
Investment Analysis
Pros
- Strong presence in US annuities with a diversified product suite including variable, fixed, and payout annuities, well positioned to benefit from ageing demographic trends.
- Generates steady gross profit margins above 30%, with recent trailing twelve-month earnings exceeding $500 million, reflecting core profitability in its main segments.
- Currently trades at a significant discount to some fair value estimates, and offers a dividend yield near 3.2%, providing income alongside potential capital appreciation.
Considerations
- Recent net income turned negative in the latest reported period, indicating potential volatility in earnings or one-off impacts that could concern investors.
- Exposure to regulatory changes and competitive pressures in the annuities market may compress net margins over time, particularly for variable and index-linked products.
- Moderate financial leverage with a debt-to-equity ratio above 50%, which could amplify risks during periods of market stress or rising interest rates.
PJT Partners
PJT
Pros
- Specialises in high-value advisory and investment solutions, including restructuring and mergers, benefiting from niche expertise and strong client relationships in corporate finance.
- Operates with a partnership culture and variable cost base, which can help maintain profitability during both robust and weaker advisory deal cycles.
- Generally maintains a strong balance sheet with no significant debt concerns, allowing flexibility to invest in talent and respond to market opportunities.
Considerations
- Revenue and profits are highly dependent on advisory fee income, which is inherently cyclical and subject to fluctuations in global M&A and restructuring activity.
- Limited product diversification beyond advisory services, increasing vulnerability to downturns in investment banking and corporate transaction volumes.
- Faces intense competition from larger, full-service investment banks with broader capital markets capabilities, which could limit market share growth.
Which Baskets Do They Appear In?
No baskets available in this category
Which Baskets Do They Appear In?
No baskets available in this category
Buy JXN or PJT in Nemo
Zero Commission
Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.
Trusted & Regulated
Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.
6% Interest on Cash
Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.
Discover More Comparisons
Jackson Financial vs BOK Financial
Jackson Financial vs BOK Financial
Jackson Financial vs Affiliated Managers Group
Jackson Financial vs Affiliated Managers Group
Jackson Financial vs PennyMac
Jackson Financial vs PennyMac