Butterfield vs Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund
Butterfield (Bank of N.T. Butterfield & Son Limited) and Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund (Kayne Anderson MLP/Midstream Investment Company) are presented for comparison. This page examines their business models, financial performance, and market context in a neutral, accessible way. Educational content, not financial advice.
Butterfield (Bank of N.T. Butterfield & Son Limited) and Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund (Kayne Anderson MLP/Midstream Investment Company) are presented for comparison. This page examines th...
Investment Analysis
Butterfield
NTB
Pros
- Butterfield is Bermuda's first and largest independent bank with a diversified international financial services presence across several jurisdictions.
- The bank offers a broad suite of retail, corporate, private banking, asset management, and trust services, supporting multiple revenue streams.
- Butterfield trades at an attractively low price-to-earnings ratio around 8, below many regional banking peers, indicating potential valuation appeal.
Considerations
- Butterfield operates primarily in small island economies, which can expose it to region-specific economic and regulatory risks.
- The bank’s total asset size is relatively modest compared to major global banks, possibly limiting scale advantages or market influence.
- As a financial institution, Butterfield faces risks from interest rate fluctuations, credit quality, and geopolitical uncertainties in its international markets.
Pros
- Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund invests primarily in North American midstream energy companies, which benefit from long-term contracts and stable cash flows.
- The fund holds a concentrated portfolio with significant stakes in top energy infrastructure companies, providing focused exposure to the sector.
- The fund offers monthly cash distributions and simplified tax reporting without K-1 forms, appealing to income-focused investors.
Considerations
- Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund is heavily concentrated in the energy midstream sector, exposing investors to commodity price volatility and regulatory risks.
- The fund trades at a notable discount to its net asset value, which may reflect market concerns about energy sector headwinds or fund-specific risks.
- Its expense ratio is relatively high compared to many ETFs or mutual funds, which could impact net returns over time.
Buy NTB or KYN in Nemo
Zero Commission
Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.
Trusted & Regulated
Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.
6% Interest on Cash
Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.
Discover More Comparisons
Butterfield vs LendingClub
Butterfield vs LendingClub
Butterfield vs Stock Yards Bancorp
Butterfield vs Stock Yards Bancorp
Butterfield vs Hilltop Holdings
Butterfield vs Hilltop Holdings