AshlandChemours

Ashland vs Chemours

This page compares Ashland and Chemours, examining their business models, financial performance, and market context to provide a neutral, accessible view for readers. Educational content, not financia...

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

No baskets available in this category

Investment Analysis

Pros

  • Ashland has successfully expanded its adjusted EBITDA margin by 110 basis points to 24.9% despite a sales decline, showing effective cost management and portfolio optimisation.
  • The company maintains stable underlying organic volumes in a challenging market, indicating resilience in core demand.
  • Ashland's Personal Care segment showed organic sales growth of 5% ex-divestiture in Q4 2025, reflecting strength in end markets.

Considerations

  • Ashland reported an 8% decline in Q4 2025 sales to $478 million and a 14% sales decline for full fiscal 2025 to $1.824 billion, impacted by portfolio divestitures.
  • Fiscal 2025 recorded a net loss of $845 million due mainly to significant goodwill impairments and sale impacts, raising concerns about asset valuation and profitability.
  • Cash flow from operations and free cash flow decreased notably in Q4 2025 compared to prior year, signaling potential liquidity or operational pressures.

Pros

  • Chemours benefits from a strong portfolio of titanium dioxide and chemical products with global market presence, supporting revenue stability.
  • The company has taken steps to reduce debt and strengthen its balance sheet in recent quarters, improving financial flexibility.
  • Chemours is exposed to growth in specialty chemicals demand in automotive and electronics sectors, offering growth potential in higher-margin segments.

Considerations

  • Chemours faces ongoing cyclicality and commodity price volatility risks due to its exposure to raw materials and global industrial markets.
  • Environmental and regulatory compliance costs remain substantial, impacting margins and requiring continuous capital expenditures.
  • Recent profit margins have been pressured by rising input costs and competitive pricing dynamics in core product lines.

Why invest with Nemo?

Nemo Logo Fade
πŸ†“

Zero Commission

Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.

πŸ”’

Trusted & Regulated

Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.

πŸ’°

6% Interest on Cash

Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.

Discover More Comparisons

AshlandFMC

Ashland vs FMC

Ashland vs FMC: stock comparison

AshlandIngevity

Ashland vs Ingevity

Ashland vs Ingevity

AshlandRamaco Resources

Ashland vs Ramaco Resources

Ashland vs Ramaco Resources

Frequently asked questions