HCI GroupGoosehead Insurance

HCI Group vs Goosehead Insurance

This page compares HCI Group and Goosehead Insurance, examining business models, financial performance, and market context to help readers understand each company. It provides neutral, accessible anal...

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Climate-Risk Underwriters

Climate-Risk Underwriters

These innovative companies are turning climate uncertainty into a measurable market opportunity. Our analysts have carefully selected insurtech pioneers who use advanced data and AI to manage environmental risks that traditional insurers avoid.

Published: June 17, 2025

Explore Basket

Investment Analysis

Pros

  • HCI Group reported a substantial earnings per share beat in Q3 2025 with EPS of $4.90 versus expectations, indicating strong profitability.
  • The company showed significant year-over-year profit growth with net income rising to $67.9 million in Q3 2025 from $9.4 million in the same quarter last year.
  • Operational efficiency and improved underwriting results contributed to improved pre-tax income of $90.6 million, highlighting management execution.

Considerations

  • HCI Group missed revenue expectations in Q3 2025, which led to moderate negative stock price reaction and concerns about top-line growth sustainability.
  • Despite profitability gains, recent revenue growth has been mixed and may indicate pressure on future expansion or market share.
  • The stock price declined slightly after earnings, suggesting investor caution in balancing strong earnings with revenue weaknesses.

Pros

  • Goosehead Insurance offers a diverse range of insurance products including homeowner’s, auto, and personal lines, providing a broad market footprint.
  • The company operates as an insurance agency, which can benefit from growth in personal insurance markets and distribution leverage.
  • Goosehead’s focus on personal lines insurance could align with steady demand in the property and casualty insurance segment.

Considerations

  • Goosehead Insurance has exhibited a highly negative and volatile return on equity (ROE), with a TTM ROE of -53.03%, indicating poor profitability.
  • Historical average ROE figures show consistent underperformance compared to industry peers and other insurance companies.
  • The company’s financial performance raises concerns about operational efficiency and the ability to generate sustainable shareholder value.

Why invest with Nemo?

Nemo Logo Fade
🆓

Zero Commission

Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.

🔒

Trusted & Regulated

Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.

💰

6% Interest on Cash

Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.

Discover More Comparisons

HCI GroupTowneBank

HCI Group vs TowneBank

HCI Group vs TowneBank: a straightforward comparison

HCI GroupBank of Hawaii

HCI Group vs Bank of Hawaii

HCI Group vs Bank of Hawaii

Bank of HawaiiGoosehead Insurance

Bank of Hawaii vs Goosehead Insurance

Bank of Hawaii vs Goosehead Insurance

Frequently asked questions