H.B. Fuller vs Hawkins

H.B. Fuller and Hawkins are compared on this page to explore how their business models, financial performance, and market context align and differ. The analysis aims to present clear, neutral information to help readers understand each company’s position within the sector. Educational content, not financial advice.

About The Companies

H.B. Fuller (FUL)

H.B. Fuller Co (FUL) is a global manufacturer of adhesives, sealants and speciality materials used across packaging, construction, hygiene, electronics and medical-device markets. With a market capitalisation around $3.26bn, the company blends higher-margin speciality formulations with larger-volume industrial adhesives. Key investor considerations include exposure to raw-material cost volatility, foreign-exchange movements and cyclical industrial demand. Management focuses on product innovation, operational efficiency and selective acquisitions to drive growth and improve margins, but successful integration and execution matter. Competitive pressure in commoditised segments can constrain pricing power while speciality niches offer opportunities for premium returns. The company’s cash generation can support reinvestment and shareholder returns, yet past performance is not a guarantee of future results. This information is general and educational only — not personalised investment advice. Prospective investors should review current financial statements, recent results and consider suitability against their own objectives and risk tolerance.

Hawkins (HWKN)

Hawkins Inc (HWKN) is a US-based chemicals distributor and manufacturer with a market capitalisation around $3.42 billion. The business supplies specialty and commodity chemicals to industrial, municipal and commercial customers, often through long-standing distribution relationships and niche manufacturing capabilities. For investors this typically means a mix of recurring revenue from supply contracts and sensitivity to raw-material costs and industrial demand cycles. Strengths can include a broad customer base, defensive elements in essential industrial services and operational scale; key risks include commodity price swings, regulatory compliance costs and cyclical end-markets. Financially inclined investors should review recent revenue trends, margins and cash flow, and compare valuation to peers. As always, values can rise and fall and past performance is not a guide to the future. This is general educational information only and not personalised advice — check your objectives and risk tolerance before taking any action.

Comparison Snapshot

Key Financial Metrics

FUL

Metric

HWKN

$3.27B

Market Cap

$2.97B

27.98%

Potential Profit

32.16%

Buy

Analyst Rating

Buy

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Earnings Over Headwinds

A carefully selected collection of companies showing exceptional earnings growth despite market challenges. These stocks were handpicked by our analysts for their ability to maintain strong performance even when facing trade tensions and economic uncertainty.

Published: July 2, 2025

Explore Basket

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Earnings Over Headwinds

Published: July 2, 2025

Explore Basket

Investment Analysis

H.B. Fuller

FUL

Pros

H.B. Fuller has a strong Zacks Rank of #2 indicating positive earnings estimate revisions.
The company maintains a relatively low Price-to-Book ratio around 1.58 to 2.59, suggesting undervaluation compared to Hawkins.
It reports solid profitability with an annual income over $130 million and EBIT of $348 million, supporting financial stability.

Considerations

The stock has a higher beta of 1.42, indicating greater volatility and potential market sensitivity.
Recent stock price is significantly below its 52-week high, implying some market concerns or correction.
The dividend yield is modest at approximately 1.55%, which may be less attractive for income-focused investors.

Hawkins

HWKN

Pros

Hawkins reported a strong revenue increase of 14.61% year-on-year in the second quarter of 2025, showing growth momentum.
The company operates in specialty chemicals, a sector with potential niche demand advantages.
Despite a higher valuation, Hawkins demonstrates operational scale that could support long-term expansion.

Considerations

Hawkins holds a weaker Zacks Rank of #3 (Hold) or #4 (Sell) in some reporting, reflecting less favourable earnings estimate revisions.
Its Price-to-Book ratio is high around 5.52, indicating possible overvaluation relative to book value.
Forward P/E is higher at about 24.31, implying the stock trades at a premium compared to H.B. Fuller.

Why invest with Nemo?

🆓

Zero Commission

Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.

🔒

Trusted & Regulated

Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.

💰

6% Interest on Cash

Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.

Discover More Comparisons

H.B. Fuller vs Avient

H.B. Fuller vs Avient: a stock comparison

H.B. Fuller vs Scotts Miracle-Gro

Scotts Miracle-Gro vs Hawkins

Scotts Miracle-Gro vs Hawkins: stock comparison

H.B. Fuller vs Hawkins

About The Companies

Comparison Snapshot

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Earnings Over Headwinds

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Earnings Over Headwinds

Investment Analysis

H.B. Fuller

Pros

Considerations

Hawkins

Pros

Considerations

Why invest with Nemo?

Zero Commission

Trusted & Regulated

6% Interest on Cash

Discover More Comparisons

H.B. Fuller vs Avient

H.B. Fuller vs Scotts Miracle-Gro

Scotts Miracle-Gro vs Hawkins

Frequently asked questions

What does a Zacks Rank indicate, and how is it relevant when comparing these two stocks?

How should price-to-book (P/B) ratios influence your view of stock value in this comparison?

Why is dividend yield mentioned in a stock comparison, and what does Stock A’s yield imply?

What does profitability tell us in this comparison, and how is it presented for these companies?

How should revenue growth influence an investment view in this page?

What are the limitations of using a single metric in stock comparison?

How do sector and market context affect interpretation of these stocks?

What does ‘valuation relative to peers’ mean in this comparison?

What should a beginner track when reading a stock comparison page like this?

How should this page be used in learning, not as financial advice?

About The Companies

Comparison Snapshot