What is the difference between revenue, earnings and earnings per share (EPS) in this comparison?

Revenue is the total income from operations before costs, while earnings indicate profit after expenses. EPS measures profit allocated to each outstanding share. In this comparison, Weatherford shows revenue trends and EPS shifts, and Matador’s figures reflect its upstream earnings. Understanding these metrics helps assess how each business generates profit relative to its size and shares outstanding.

Why are long-term growth and volatility both mentioned for Weatherford?

Long-term growth highlights significant share price appreciation over years, while volatility notes short-term price fluctuations. For Weatherford, the 2700% rise over five years contrasts with recent declines and price swings, illustrating how strong longer trends can coexist with periodical uncertainties tied to sector dynamics.

How should I interpret ‘undervalued’ as stated for Weatherford?

Undervalued implies the stock’s price may be lower than estimates of its intrinsic value based on models or projections. In this context, Weatherford is suggested to have potential upside of around 70%, reflecting analysis that current prices may not fully reflect future earnings or assets.

What does diversification across plays mean for Matador Resources?

Matador Resources operates across multiple shale plays (e.g., Wolfcamp, Bone Spring, Eagle Ford, Haynesville). This diversification can spread production risk across regions, potentially stabilising revenue when prices for one area falter, while exposing the company to broader commodity cycles.

How does the midstream element affect weatherford’s and matador’s finances?

Weatherford’s core service mix emphasises oilfield services; Matador integrates upstream with some midstream activities. Midstream exposure can provide revenue diversification and potential cash flow stability, but also introduces its own regulatory and operational risks; both impact how results are reported.

What role do commodity prices play in these two stocks’ performance?

Commodity price volatility—oil and gas—influences revenues, margins, and investment sentiment. Matador is directly exposed to these prices through production volumes, while Weatherford’s service demand also tracks activity levels in oilfields, influencing earnings trends and volatility.

Why might analysts have divergent forecasts for Weatherford?

Analysts may disagree due to differing assumptions about oilfield activity, cost control, and execution outcomes. This can produce a wide range of price targets for Weatherford, reflecting uncertainty in near-term results and longer-term recovery prospects.

How should I compare the recent 12-month performance between the two stocks?

Review the 12-month price change alongside revenue and EPS trends. Weatherford shows a substantial decline recently and notable volatility, whereas Matador’s performance is linked to industry cycles and regional production outcomes. Contextualise with sector conditions and company updates for a fair comparison.

What does it mean that Weatherford’s revenue may fall while Matador’s operations span several plays?

If Weatherford’s revenue dips, it may reflect short-term demand or project delays, while Matador’s diversified operations offer resilience across plays. Observing both revenue movement and regional exposure helps understand how each company manages market cycles and operational risk.

What is meant by ‘no recommendations’ in this educational page?

The page presents information to help readers understand how each company operates, reports results, and fits within the energy sector. It purposefully avoids buy/sell recommendations or forecasts, focusing on neutral, factual explanations to aid understanding.

Weatherford vs Matador Resources

Weatherford International is an oilfield services company that emerged from bankruptcy and is now focused on leaner operations and cash generation across its pressure control and well construction segments, while Matador Resources is an independent E&P operator growing production aggressively in the Permian Basin with a strong balance sheet backing it. Both businesses are tied to oil and gas activity levels but sit on opposite sides of the services versus production divide. Weatherford vs Matador Resources reveals how a restructured services company compares to a growth-oriented Permian driller on return on capital, debt management, and leverage to the commodity cycle.

Comparison Snapshot

Key Financial Metrics

WFRD

Metric

MTDR

$7.34B

Market Cap

$6.91B

-13.38%

Potential Profit

7.49%

Buy

Analyst Rating

Buy

Discover More Comparisons

Weatherford vs Chord Energy

Weatherford provides well completion, production, and intervention services to oil and gas operators worldwide, competing in a sector where pricing power tracks rig counts and operator capital budgets, while Chord Energy operates as an upstream producer in the Williston Basin, owning the wells and earning directly from the crude it pulls out of the ground. Both are tethered to oil prices, but Weatherford's service revenues track drilling activity with a lag while Chord's cash flows move with commodity prices in real time. The Weatherford vs Chord Energy comparison breaks down how cost structures, leverage profiles, and shareholder return frameworks diverge across the oilfield services and upstream production segments.

Weatherford vs Noble

Weatherford International provides oilfield services after emerging from bankruptcy with a leaner cost structure and a renewed focus on profitability, while Noble Corporation operates a fleet of offshore drilling rigs for deepwater and harsh-environment exploration campaigns. Both companies serve upstream oil and gas customers whose spending ebbs and flows with crude prices and exploration budgets. Weatherford vs Noble examines two energy-services businesses with restructured balance sheets to see which one converts the current offshore upcycle into lasting shareholder value.

Weatherford vs Sunrun

Weatherford delivers complex wellbore services and completion tools to oil and gas operators globally after navigating a bankruptcy restructuring, while Sunrun finances and installs residential solar systems and competes for consumer energy dollars through long-term service agreements. Both carry substantial debt loads relative to their operating income, making balance sheet resilience a central concern for any fundamental analysis. The Weatherford vs Sunrun comparison explores how leverage, asset intensity, and revenue visibility differ between a reformed oilfield services company and a capital-heavy clean energy installer.

Investment Analysis

Weatherford

WFRD

Pros

Weatherford International’s stock has demonstrated extraordinary long-term growth, rising over 2700% in the last five years despite short-term volatility.
Valuation models suggest Weatherford is significantly undervalued, with potential upside of around 70% indicating attractive long-term investment opportunity.
The company is expected to maintain substantial revenue levels near $4.85 billion annually, supported by a broad service offering in oilfield services.

Considerations

Weatherford’s revenue and earnings per share have shown recent declines, with revenue projected to fall around 12% this year and EPS down over 23%.
Short-term stock price has been volatile, including a 28% drop in the last 12 months and a near 10% decline year-to-date, reflecting sector risks and execution uncertainties.
Despite bullish price forecasts, analyst consensus includes notable differences, with some forecasts predicting wide price fluctuations and ongoing operational challenges.

Matador Resources

MTDR

Pros

Matador Resources operates in multiple prolific U.S. shale plays including Wolfcamp, Bone Spring, Eagle Ford, and Haynesville, diversifying its production base geographically.
The company integrates upstream exploration and production with midstream operations, which supports operational efficiency and revenue diversification.
Recent corporate developments include leadership promotions and successful expansion projects, indicating active management and growth initiatives.

Considerations

Matador Resources faces exposure to commodity price volatility inherent in oil and natural gas markets, which could affect financial performance.
The company's market cap places it in the mid-size independent sector, which may involve higher cyclicality and execution risk compared to larger integrated producers.
Recent industry analyses caution on possible momentum challenges and headwinds for energy stocks, potentially impacting Matador's near-term stock performance.

About Weatherford and Matador Resources

Weatherford (WFRD)

Weatherford International plc is a global energy services company. The Company is engaged in providing equipment and services used in the drilling, evaluation, well construction, completion, production, intervention and responsible abandonment of wells in the oil and natural gas exploration and production industry as well as new energy platforms. The Company operates through three segments: Drilling and Evaluation (DRE), Well Construction and Completions (WCC), and Production and Intervention (PRI). DRE offers a suite of services, including managed pressure drilling, drilling services, wireline, and drilling fluids. WCC offers products and services for well integrity assurance across the full life cycle of the well. PRI offers a suite of reservoir stimulation designs and engineering capabilities that isolate zones and unlock reserves in conventional and unconventional wells, deep water, and aging reservoirs. Its platforms include ForeSite, CygNet, CENTRO, and others.

Matador Resources (MTDR)

Matador Resources Company is an independent American energy firm focused on the exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. Its primary operations are concentrated in key unconventional shale plays within the United States, particularly the oil-rich Wolfcamp and Bone Spring formations in the Delaware Basin, which covers parts of New Mexico and West Texas. The company operates through two main segments: 'exploration and production', which is its core business of finding and extracting resources, and 'midstream'. The midstream arm supports its primary operations by providing essential services like natural gas processing, water disposal, and transportation for both its own use and for third parties. This integrated model allows Matador to manage more of the production lifecycle. Investors may find it an interesting example of a focused US-based energy producer, but should remember that its performance is linked to volatile energy prices.

Buy WFRD or MTDR in Nemo

🆓

Zero Commission

Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.

🔒

Trusted & Regulated

Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.

💰

6% Interest on Cash

Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.

Weatherford vs Matador Resources

Comparison Snapshot