

Kimbell Royalty Partners vs Select Water Solutions
Kimbell Royalty Partners collects oil and gas royalties from mineral interests across multiple U.S. basins, earning revenue without operating a single well, while Select Water Solutions provides water management, recycling, and chemical services directly to operators drilling on the same basins. Both companies depend on E&P operator activity levels, but Kimbell sits upstream of all the operational costs that compress Select's margins. The Kimbell Royalty Partners vs Select Water Solutions comparison examines royalty payout rates and basin diversification against service contract volumes, customer concentration, and how each business holds cash flow when drilling activity softens.
Kimbell Royalty Partners collects oil and gas royalties from mineral interests across multiple U.S. basins, earning revenue without operating a single well, while Select Water Solutions provides water...
Investment Analysis
Pros
- Owns mineral and royalty interests in over 17 million gross acres spanning 28 states, offering extensive geographic diversification.
- Holds interests in more than 130,000 gross wells, including a significant position with over 51,000 wells in the prolific Permian Basin.
- Maintains exposure to multiple major onshore U.S. basins like Appalachian, Eagle Ford, and Bakken, supporting diverse hydrocarbon sources.
Considerations
- Reported a slight year-over-year revenue decline of 0.5% and significant earnings drop of 81.8%, indicating recent profitability pressure.
- Diluted earnings per share are currently negative, reflecting short-term profitability challenges or possible accounting impacts.
- Royalties and mineral interests are inherently exposed to commodity price volatility and regulatory risks tied to the oil and gas sector.
Pros
- Leader in sustainable water and chemical solutions specifically tailored for the energy industry’s full lifecycle water management.
- Integrated operations covering critical water infrastructure, chemical manufacturing, and water treatment and recycling enhance operational efficiencies.
- Strong market share across service capabilities in all major U.S. unconventional basins, supporting a broad and stable customer base.
Considerations
- Revenue concentration with roughly 65% derived from completions-oriented activities, which may be exposed to oilfield activity cyclicality.
- Highly dependent on the energy sector’s capital spending trends, which can fluctuate significantly with commodity price cycles and regulations.
- Complex operational footprint involving chemical and infrastructure services could pose execution and integration risks amid evolving environmental rules.
Buy KRP or WTTR in Nemo
Zero Commission
Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.
Trusted & Regulated
Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.
6% Interest on Cash
Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.


