Houlihan LokeyEvercore

Houlihan Lokey vs Evercore

Houlihan Lokey dominates middle-market M&A advisory and restructuring with a counter-cyclical restructuring engine that earns fees when deals dry up, while Evercore competes at the very top of indepen...

Investment Analysis

Pros

  • Houlihan Lokey has demonstrated strong revenue growth, with a five-year CAGR of 16% and a 36% year-on-year increase in Corporate Finance segment revenue in Q3 2025.
  • The company maintains a healthy balance sheet, with a low debt-to-equity ratio of 0.2, indicating conservative use of leverage.
  • Houlihan Lokey has delivered robust shareholder returns, with a 153% total return over three years and a solid dividend payout.

Considerations

  • Despite strong growth, Houlihan Lokey's return on equity is below industry benchmarks, suggesting less efficient use of shareholder capital.
  • The company's valuation is relatively high, with a P/E ratio above 29, which may limit near-term upside for new investors.
  • Houlihan Lokey's stock has shown volatility, with recent price declines despite strong earnings, reflecting sensitivity to market sentiment.

Pros

  • Evercore Partners benefits from a leading position in M&A advisory, with strong deal flow expected as transaction volumes rebound to historical averages.
  • The company has a high return on equity, exceeding industry averages, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
  • Evercore maintains a solid net profit margin, reflecting effective cost management and strong profitability.

Considerations

  • Evercore's revenue growth has lagged behind some peers, with less pronounced top-line expansion in recent quarters.
  • The company's valuation is elevated, with a P/E ratio above 30, which may constrain further multiple expansion.
  • Evercore is exposed to cyclical fluctuations in M&A activity, making earnings sensitive to broader economic trends and market volatility.

Related Market Insights

Banking Consolidation Europe: Might UniCredit Spark Wave?

UniCredit's Commerzbank stake sale could ignite a wave of European banking M&A. Discover investment opportunities in consolidation with Nemo's thematic Neme. Invest commission-free.

Author avatar

Aimee Silverwood | Financial Analyst

September 15, 2025

Read Insight

Wall Street's Deal Architects: The M&A Boom Beneficiaries

The M&A market is surging, creating huge fee opportunities for Wall Street's deal architects. Discover how investment banks & advisory firms profit from this boom. Invest with Nemo.

Author avatar

Aimee Silverwood | Financial Analyst

July 25, 2025

Read Insight

The Megadeal Bonanza: Why Investment Banks Are Cashing In

Global M&A surges 30%, megadeals up 74%. Discover how top investment banks like Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, and JPMorgan are cashing in on massive advisory fees. Invest in the deal-making bonanza.

Author avatar

Aimee Silverwood | Financial Analyst

July 25, 2025

Read Insight

European Banking's Great Consolidation: The M&A Wave Finally Begins

UniCredit's Commerzbank stake sparks European banking M&A. Invest in potential merger targets & advisory firms profiting from deal fees. Explore this Neme on Nemo.

Author avatar

Aimee Silverwood | Financial Analyst

July 25, 2025

Read Insight

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Banking Consolidation Europe: Might UniCredit Spark Wave?

Banking Consolidation Europe: Might UniCredit Spark Wave?

Italian banking giant UniCredit is considering the sale of its significant stake in Germany's Commerzbank, potentially to a buyer outside the European Union. This development could trigger a wave of consolidation and acquisition activity across the European banking sector, creating opportunities for strategic investors and advisory firms.

Published: September 15, 2025

Explore Basket
European Banking M&A

European Banking M&A

UniCredit's major stake in Commerzbank signals the start of European banking consolidation. Our experts have selected companies positioned to benefit from this wave, including potential M&A targets and the investment banks that will earn fees from these deals.

Published: July 10, 2025

Explore Basket
The Dealmakers: M&A Boom

The Dealmakers: M&A Boom

A carefully selected group of financial institutions driving today's surge in mergers and acquisitions. These companies are the architects behind billion-dollar deals, earning significant fees as corporate dealmaking accelerates.

Published: June 30, 2025

Explore Basket
Megadeal Mania

Megadeal Mania

The world of big business deals is booming, with global merger activity up 30% to $1.89 trillion. This collection features the financial powerhouses behind these massive transactions – the investment banks, advisory firms, and private equity giants that stand to profit from the deal-making surge.

Published: June 30, 2025

Explore Basket

Buy HLI or EVR in Nemo

Nemo Logo Fade
πŸ†“

Zero Commission

Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.

πŸ”’

Trusted & Regulated

Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.

πŸ’°

6% Interest on Cash

Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.

Discover More Comparisons

Houlihan LokeyCNA

Houlihan Lokey vs CNA

Houlihan Lokey earns its fees advising on mergers, restructurings, and capital raises, with a business model that scales with deal activity but requires almost no balance sheet, while CNA Financial underwrites commercial insurance across middle-market and specialty segments. Both companies generate strong free cash flow in favorable environments and have rewarded shareholders with capital returns over time. Houlihan Lokey vs CNA unpacks how revenue predictability, operating leverage, and cycle sensitivity differ between a pure advisory franchise and a diversified commercial insurer.

Houlihan LokeyUnum

Houlihan Lokey vs Unum

Houlihan Lokey wins mandates advising on restructurings, M&A, and capital markets transactions as an independent investment bank, while Unum Group insures workers against disability, life events, and voluntary benefits through employer-sponsored plans. Both businesses generate revenue from corporate clients, but one profits most when deals flow and the other thrives on premium income that persists through economic cycles. Houlihan Lokey vs Unum examines revenue cyclicality, balance sheet risk, and which company's earnings stream justifies its current valuation.

Houlihan LokeyFranklin Templeton

Houlihan Lokey vs Franklin Templeton

Houlihan Lokey has carved out a leading position in restructuring advisory, thriving precisely when balance sheets break under debt loads, while Franklin Templeton manages trillions across mutual funds and ETFs for retail and institutional investors who need diversified market exposure. Both earn fees from capital-markets activity, but Houlihan Lokey gets busier when markets deteriorate and Franklin Templeton's AUM shrinks when they do. Houlihan Lokey vs Franklin Templeton explores how counter-cyclical advisory revenue competes with the economies of scale available to a massive traditional asset manager across a full market cycle.

Frequently asked questions

HLI
HLI$141.32
vs
EVR
EVR$304.95