What is a high-level difference between these two funds in terms of income sources?

Stock 1 emphasises real estate income with a high annual distribution rate, including a large component from return of capital. Stock 2 focuses on tax-free income through investment-grade municipal securities. This means Stock 1 may show higher current payouts with potential capital return implications, while Stock 2 aims for more stable, tax-efficient income.

How do beta and market risk differ between the two funds?

Stock 1 has a higher beta around 1.44, indicating greater sensitivity to market swings. Stock 2 has a lower beta around 0.35, suggesting a more defensive stance with less market-driven volatility. Investors can expect Stock 1 to react more to overall market movements than Stock 2.

What does ‘price-to-earnings' imply for this comparison?

For Stock 2, a high price-to-earnings ratio above 70 suggests valuations may be elevated relative to earnings, signalling potential overpricing or lower near-term earnings visibility. Stock 1’s earnings dynamics are more focused on real estate income and distributions, which behave differently from P/E metrics.

Which fund is more focused on fixed income and tax efficiency?

Stock 2 concentrates on high-grade municipal bonds, offering tax-exempt income potential and a lower risk profile. This creates a relatively steady yield with lower market sensitivity. Stock 1, while diversified across real estate sectors, relies on income from property-related assets with higher volatility.

How should one interpret the ‘distribution rate’ versus ‘dividend yield’ in these funds?

Stock 1 reports a high annualised distribution rate (around 14.6–16.6%), driven by monthly payouts and a portion of return of capital. Stock 2 reports a stable yield near 4.5% from investment-grade bonds. A high rate for Stock 1 may not equal sustainable income, whereas Stock 2’s yield reflects fixed income defaults and tax considerations.

What does diversification mean in this comparison?

Stock 1 provides global diversification across real estate sectors (office, retail, industrial, healthcare) to spread sector and regional risk. Stock 2 relies on municipal bonds, diversifying by issuer and credit quality within the tax-free income space. Each approach addresses risk differently based on asset class.

What are the implied capital depreciation risks for these funds?

Stock 1 has experienced a volatile price and NAV, with a 1-year total return around -10%, indicating capital depreciation risk alongside the income story. Stock 2 focuses on income stability, with less emphasis on capital appreciation, reflecting its fixed income orientation.

How might market sentiment affect each fund differently?

Stock 1’s performance is more sensitive to real estate cycles and broader equity market sentiment due to higher beta. Stock 2 may be more resilient in downturns thanks to its defensive, municipal-bond orientation, though credit and interest-rate moves can still influence performance.

What practical factors should a beginner consider when comparing these funds?

Consider income stability, tax implications, and risk tolerance. Evaluate whether a higher current yield (Stock 1) aligns with sustainability and capital risk, or whether tax-free income (Stock 2) better fits your tax situation. Review fees, liquidity, and how distributions are sourced.

Is there an educational disclaimer I should be aware of when interpreting this comparison?

This page provides educational information intended to aid understanding of how the two funds differ in business model, performance and market context. It is not financial advice, nor a recommendation to buy or sell. Always perform your own research and consult a qualified adviser.

CBRE Global Real Estate Income vs Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio

CBRE Global Real Estate Income chases property-backed dividends while Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio funnels cash flows through municipal bond exemptions. Both funds court income-hungry investors who want yield without riding equity volatility. The CBRE Global Real Estate Income vs Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio comparison reveals how real-asset exposure stacks up against tax-advantaged fixed income when you're sizing up after-tax return potential.

Comparison Snapshot

Key Financial Metrics

IGR

Metric

NXP

$664.65M

Market Cap

$746.29M

N/A

Potential Profit

N/A

Analyst Rating

N/A

Investment Analysis

CBRE Global Real Estate Income

IGR

Pros

CBRE Global Real Estate Income Fund offers a high current income with an annualized distribution rate around 14.6-16.6%, supported by monthly payouts.
The fund is globally diversified across various real estate sectors, including office, retail, industrial, and healthcare, mitigating regional and sector risks.
CBRE Group's strong underlying performance, with significant revenue and net income growth in 2025, supports the fund’s stability and income generation.

Considerations

A large portion of distributions (around 88%) comes from return of capital, which may impact the sustainability of income over the long term.
The fund has a relatively high beta of approximately 1.44, indicating higher sensitivity to market fluctuations compared to typical fixed income investments.
The price and net asset value have shown volatility with a 1-year total return negative at about -10%, indicating capital depreciation risk.

Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio

NXP

Pros

Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio primarily invests in investment-grade municipal securities, providing tax-exempt income potential.
The fund maintains a low beta of around 0.35, reflecting lower market risk and a defensive profile suitable for risk-averse investors.
It offers a stable dividend yield near 4.5%, supported by its investment in high-grade municipal bonds rated BBB or higher.

Considerations

The fund trades at a high price-to-earnings ratio above 70, suggesting that valuations may be elevated relative to underlying earnings.
Recent technical and market analyses suggest a weak near-term performance outlook, leading to downgrades in its trading sentiment.
Limited growth prospects are evident given the fund’s fixed income focus and absence of leverage, which restricts capital appreciation potential.

About CBRE Global Real Estate Income and Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio

CBRE Global Real Estate Income (IGR)

CBRE Global Real Estate Income Fund (the Trust) is a diversified, closed-end management investment company. The Trust’s primary objective is high current income, and its secondary objective is capital appreciation. It invests globally, with an emphasis on the income-producing common equity and preferred stocks of real estate companies. It invests approximately 25% of its assets in preferred securities of global real estate companies. The Trust invests in Real Estate Equity Securities where dividend distributions are subject to withholding taxes as determined by United States tax treaties with respective individual foreign countries. The Trust invests over 20% of its total assets in preferred securities that are rated below investment grade. Its portfolio of investments includes residential, industrial, data centers, malls, healthcare, offices, towers, shopping centers, hotels, and self-storage. CBRE Investment Management Listed Real Assets LLC is the investment adviser of the Trust.

Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio (NXP)

The Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio (NXP) is a type of investment known as a closed-end fund. Its primary goal is to provide investors with a regular stream of income that is exempt from regular US federal income tax, while also aiming to preserve the original capital invested. To achieve this, the fund invests at least 80% of its assets in municipal bonds. These are essentially loans to local governments to fund public projects. The fund offers a diversified portfolio of these bonds, managed by its investment adviser, Nuveen Fund Advisors, LLC. It's important for potential investors to be aware that up to 20% of the fund’s assets can be invested in bonds that are considered below investment grade, which may carry a higher level of risk. As with any investment, the value of the portfolio can go down as well as up, and returns are not guaranteed.

Buy IGR or NXP in Nemo

🆓

Zero Commission

Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.

🔒

Trusted & Regulated

Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.

💰

6% Interest on Cash

Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.

Discover More Comparisons

CBRE Global Real Estate Income vs Heritage Insurance

CBRE Global Real Estate Income Fund invests in real estate equity and debt securities as a closed-end vehicle targeting income-oriented investors, while Heritage Insurance Holdings underwrites homeowners and commercial property insurance in catastrophe-exposed coastal markets. Both businesses are exposed to real estate values and the cost of property risk, but from opposite sides of the capital structure. CBRE Global Real Estate Income vs Heritage Insurance shows how a real estate income fund and a specialty property insurer navigate rising property costs, interest rate sensitivity, and capital adequacy.

CBRE Global Real Estate Income vs MainStay CBRE Global Infrastructure Megatrends

CBRE Global Real Estate Income Fund focuses on income generation through global real estate securities while MainStay CBRE Global Infrastructure Megatrends targets infrastructure assets tied to secular themes like energy transition and digital connectivity. Both closed-end funds share CBRE's investment platform and target income-oriented investors seeking real asset exposure. The CBRE Global Real Estate Income vs MainStay CBRE Global Infrastructure Megatrends comparison helps investors understand how property-focused income streams stack up against infrastructure-linked cash flows on yield, discount to NAV, and portfolio construction.

CBRE Global Real Estate Income vs Vinci Compass

CBRE Global Real Estate Income focuses on income-generating property assets while Vinci Compass targets a different slice of the alternative investment universe with a distinct risk-return profile. CBRE Global Real Estate Income vs Vinci Compass puts two investment vehicles head-to-head on yield, fee structure, and underlying asset quality. Both aim to deliver steady distributions to income-seeking investors navigating a higher-for-longer rate environment. Readers'll find a clear comparison of portfolio composition, expense ratios, distribution histories, and the macro conditions that favor one structure over the other.

CBRE Global Real Estate Income vs Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio

Comparison Snapshot

Investment Analysis

CBRE Global Real Estate Income

Pros

Considerations

Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio

Pros

Considerations

About CBRE Global Real Estate Income and Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio

Buy IGR or NXP in Nemo

Zero Commission

Trusted & Regulated

6% Interest on Cash

Discover More Comparisons

CBRE Global Real Estate Income vs Heritage Insurance

CBRE Global Real Estate Income vs MainStay CBRE Global Infrastructure Megatrends

CBRE Global Real Estate Income vs Vinci Compass

Frequently asked questions

What is a high-level difference between these two funds in terms of income sources?

How do beta and market risk differ between the two funds?

What does ‘price-to-earnings' imply for this comparison?

Which fund is more focused on fixed income and tax efficiency?

How should one interpret the ‘distribution rate’ versus ‘dividend yield’ in these funds?

What does diversification mean in this comparison?

What are the implied capital depreciation risks for these funds?

How might market sentiment affect each fund differently?

What practical factors should a beginner consider when comparing these funds?

Is there an educational disclaimer I should be aware of when interpreting this comparison?

Comparison Snapshot

About CBRE Global Real Estate Income and Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio